Step 1: Cheat On The Bar Exam, Step 2: Announce On Reddit That … – Above the Law

Subscribe and get breaking news, commentary, and opinions on law firms, lawyers, law schools, lawsuits, judges, and more.
bar-exam-300×182In a brilliant opening move for any career, Redditor burnerman1818 went on the barexam subreddit to share some personal news. On the plus side, he (and we’re just assuming based on the burnerMAN handle) passed the Illinois bar exam.
Huzzah!
But also, he totally cheated on it.
Less huzzah.
At this point, burnerman1818 did what any responsible person faced with a crisis of conscience would do: he went to Reddit (whole thread here).
Screen Shot 2022-10-06 at 9.43.04 AM
(h/t to Twitter’s @deadastin_e who flagged this post — and also has a request if folks out there can help.)
I’m very much on record that the bar exam should not be a closed book test. Applicants who successfully recognize the question being asked, seek out and find (in the real world… not some artificial packet of curated test materials) the right resources to address the issue, and then effectively communicate the answer better demonstrate “minimum competency” to be a lawyer than someone who memorized a handbook.
I’m also very much on record that until those reforms are made, you shouldn’t be cheating.
And if the initial confession wasn’t enough, note that question 2 contemplates that — once sworn in as an attorney — this guy intends to commit an ongoing ethical breach by not reporting it. Are we sure he didn’t cheat on the MPRE too?
Responses weren’t all that supportive:
Screen Shot 2022-10-06 at 10.10.05 AM
In burnerman1818’s defense, his accommodations probably are legitimate. While he seems to blow them off as part of his cheating operation, the psychologist involved is, presumably, a professional and not easily duped. And, frankly, burnerman1818’s behavior carries some of the markers of ADHD. So it’s not necessarily fair that he didn’t need accommodations, he just needed to not use his accommodations to cheat.
And, for the record, the overwhelming majority people getting accommodations are not using them to cheat and stories like this are just going to trigger bar examiners to make baseless overreactions and deny accommodations because of a .0000001% chance someone like this exists.
Screen Shot 2022-10-06 at 10.12.37 AM
Oh ffs. I’m actively questioning how he failed the bar exam twice before? If he already had a well-developed pattern of cheating through school did he just decide to go legit for the bar exam? Because this is starting to read like a bad heist movie with burnerman1818 trying to give up the cheating life, but realizing he couldn’t make it on the outside so he went back in for one last score.
While the response above suggested there may be no way to catch this guy, it actually seems pretty easy. Accommodations aren’t that widespread, so just match UIC Marshall grads who failed twice, passed the third time with accommodations, and who also claimed accommodations in law school. It’s hard to imagine that’s a search result of more than one or two.
That’s why another Redditor has some suspicions:
Screen Shot 2022-10-06 at 10.30.45 AM
A false flag operation! Now the plot thickens. But what would be the motive?
Screen Shot 2022-10-06 at 10.33.01 AM
Could — for lack of a better name — the ex-burnerfriend be a newly minted lawyer getting not so anonymously maligned? If the play is to get the ex in trouble it seems even more stupid to use a handle that ends in “man.” It would make it pretty easy to figure out what’s going on.
So, is this incredibly stupid or a bumbling revenge attempt? Such a difficult question!
And me with no flashcards to help answer it.
HeadshotJoe Patrice is a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Feel free to email any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him on Twitter if you’re interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search.
Bar Exams, Law Schools, Legal Ethics
We will never sell or share your information without your consent. See our privacy policy.
* Twitter who signed agreements committing them to private arbitration cannot pursue a class action against the company. Though the judge noted a few members of the proposed class had opted out of that agreement so the case lives on for the moment. Musk still unaware of the ruling because it’s buried under all the crap in the “For You” feed. [Reuters]
* The UK has blocked Scotland’s gender recognition law. Because post-Brexit the smartest thing England can do is further alienate Scotland and Northern Ireland. [CNN]
* FTC blows dusts off antitrust rule book like discovering ancient lore in an enchanted dungeon. Will address big box retailers getting massive discounts from manufacturers to maximize profit over smaller competitors. [Bloomberg]
* Tensions may be developing between Supreme Court justices. Amazing what happens when one wing of the Court fully abandons the law to be politicians. [The Atlantic]
* Over a third of legal workers hate their boss. Congratulations lawyers! I’d have expected a much higher number. [LegalCheek]
Soft sofa. Furniture background. Dog lies on turquoise velour sofa. Cozy and comfortable home interior.What’s That Lassie? You’re In Biglaw?!: Slaughter & May has a killer Bring Your Pet to Work Day.
Laurence Finds A New Tribe: Prominent law professor lands his first firm gig. Woe to the first partner that tries to correct his work.
Corporate People Can Be Ethical Too: Downsizing doesn’t have to mean screwing over.
A Jab At Biden Could Be A Haymaker For Trump: The hubbub about special documents really cuts differently when you don’t follow the rules.
Bonus Season Ain’t Over!: Hear the good news from WSGR.
Happy MLK Day!
Our Sites
© 2023 Breaking Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Registration or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Privacy Center | Do not sell my information
DMCA compliant image




source

Leave a Comment