How a passion for research could hinder your career and … –

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar
You have full access to this article via your institution.

Promoting passion in career decisions can hamper workplace diversity efforts.Credit: Getty
Erin Cech started her academic life 22 years ago in electrical engineering, but found that the extra sociology classes she took as an undergraduate were more meaningful and relevant, so she swapped subjects. Now a sociologist at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, she argues in her 2021 book The Trouble With Passion that choosing a profession you love can risk exploitation by employers and inequality in the workplace and, ironically, undermine productivity.
My inspiration for studying electrical engineering was my grandmother, who had gone blind by the time my mum was in her teens. She was amazing, she lived by herself in a 100-year-old house. I wanted to help make assistive technologies better than the ones she had access to. I did well in engineering, but kept asking my professors questions about things like access, usability and inequality. They not only didn’t know the answers, but didn’t always think the questions were relevant and pushed me to pursue other fields, particularly sociology.
I started taking sociology classes and realized that the discipline contained the tools, both methodological and theoretical, that I needed to be able to understand processes of inequality in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM), and in the wider world. I really began to understand the power of those tools for thinking about the inequality issues that I felt so compelled to address.
Yes. It was during an ethics class in my electrical-engineering curriculum. I was giving a presentation on how organizations need to think about and address inequality in the workforce. Halfway through, a fellow student raised his hand and said, “Why are you talking about this? Poor people are only poor because they’re lazy and stupid.”
Erin Cech researches cultural aspects of inequality.Credit: Moni Valentini
It wasn’t so much the comment that got me, but the reaction of everybody else in the room, which was to laugh along. And the teacher didn’t push back on the idea that the labour force was a meritocracy. That led to this realization that there was something about the culture of STEM that helped to perpetuate these kinds of perspective on the world that felt very pressing and troubling. That was a moment that made me think, I want to be able to study these patterns of inequality more deeply.
I specialize in the cultural mechanisms of inequality. I’m especially interested in beliefs and practices that broadly seem positive or benign but can be really powerful forces driving inequality, because they sit under the radar of expectations for equal treatment. Self-expression is one example: we tend to think of self-expressive choices and actions as widely beneficial, yet my research reveals that, because ‘selves’ are gendered, classed and racialized constructs, these choices can help to perpetuate things such as occupational gender and race segregation.
It started as something entirely different, about how women and men make decisions about their majors at university and about what they want to do after graduation. As I was doing the research, I came up with idea of the passion principle. It became blatantly obvious — I couldn’t ignore it. The narratives just became so loud and compelling that I realized I needed to write this as the centrepiece of a book.
It is the cultural idea that the best way for people to make career decisions is to focus on their sense of identity, fulfilment and what they find meaningful, often without considering factors such as job security and salary.
I looked at how potential employers evaluate applications and found that they are not only more likely to be interested in hiring an applicant who expresses passion for the work than someone who doesn’t, but also more likely to hire that person because they think they will put in more effort without an increase in compensation. So there’s an understanding of the potential labour that could be extracted from the passionate person. I suspect that if employers don’t see their employees expressing passion, there’s often the assumption that that person isn’t as competent or skilled as somebody else.
At the individual level, the promotion of passion in career decision making amplifies segregation in STEM fields. If we tell people to go and pursue the thing they’re passionate about, they often follow paths that end up reproducing the same entrenched patterns of gender, race or class segregation. These paths are not the product of innate senses of interest, but rather how people are socialized over the course of their lives.
There’s no systematic evidence in the social-science literature that says that people who are passionate about their work are producing better products than people who aren’t.
In fact, there could be a penalty for being passionate about work. We know that people who have time for rest and recuperation in their lives away from their job are more productive and more creative when they do their work. If someone is so passionate about their work that they don’t have, or don’t have time for, outside interests, the lack of time and space for creative or rejuvenating activities can actually undermine productivity and creativity.
The reason that people pursue their passion is because the labour market demands such intensive commitments to work. Among professionals, especially STEM professionals, there’s the expectation to work 50, 60, 70 hours a week routinely, and the idea of going into a workplace where you don’t love your work is really daunting. If someone loves their job, at least it wouldn’t feel such like drudgery. And so, the desire to follow passion is an individual-level solution to the structural problems of overwork and the demand for overwork.
For professional, service and blue-collar workers alike, whether people like their jobs has a great deal to do with how others treat them at work. I would argue that being treated with dignity at work is more important than having a passion for long-term satisfaction and enjoyment, and one that spans education level and career type.
The passion principle is an OK thing to pursue if you are taking a holistic approach to understanding your relationship to paid employment. It is a good idea to be reflective about the kinds of sacrifice that are made and be honest with yourself about what you want.

Collection: Life in the lab
Of course, passion has its benefits. Being in a job aligned with one’s passion is related to increased engagement and job satisfaction. Yet, there are other ways to find job satisfaction and engagement. Enjoying the company of colleagues is one; being inspired by the organization is another. I’m not advocating that everyone should myopically pursue financial security or the highest salary they can get, even if they hate the work; rather, the book raises concerns about the risk both for individual workers and for the workforce overall, when passion becomes the central focus of career decision making and too much is sacrificed in pursuit of passion.
Diversify your ‘meaning-making portfolio’. Make room in your schedule for fulfilling tasks or activities that really drive you, that are exciting and interesting outside work. That’s so important, because the labour force is inherently unstable. If people put all their identity eggs in one basket, in their passion — their employment — then their job suddenly goes away, or they’re reassigned to something they’re not passionate about, that can feel like a loss of the core part of their identity. Nurturing spaces of identity outside work is especially important for graduate students and early-career STEM professionals, because the academic labour market, in particular, is uncertain.
I hope it’s useful and important for the research community, but also for other constituencies — undergraduate and graduate students, people in the policy space and people in organizational leadership positions. It might be helpful for those deciding what they want to do after university, for example, or who mentor or structure the experiences of people in that position, such as parents, secondary-school teachers or university administrators.
I’ve had to adapt how I pursue it. It has been important to recognize my own privilege and the privilege of other faculty members around me that we got lucky in pursuing our passion and have jobs that are relatively stable and well-paying, but many other people aren’t as lucky.
I’ve also had to make room in my schedule for other things I’m passionate about — playing my violin, doing a bit of dot-mandala painting and enjoying nature outside, hiking with my wife.
This interview has been edited for length and clarity.
Balance is needed when discussing academic careers
Beware survivorship bias in advice on science careers
How philosophy is making me a better scientist
PhD training is no longer fit for purpose — it needs reform now
Latino scientists need professional incentives to return home
Preprint review should form part of PhD programmes and postdoc training
World View
Teaching teachers deserves more credit in China
Preprint review should form part of PhD programmes and postdoc training
World View
How coaching could help tackle toxic research cultures
Career Q&A
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove
Young physicists say ethics rules are being ignored
How India’s caste system limits diversity in science — in six charts
News Feature
Baylor College of Medicine (BCM)
Houston, TX, United States
The University of Tennessee Health Science Center (UTHSC)
Memphis, TN, United States
Michigan State University (MSU)
East Lansing, MI, United States
The University of Edinburgh
Edinburgh, United Kingdom
You have full access to this article via your institution.

Balance is needed when discussing academic careers
Beware survivorship bias in advice on science careers
How philosophy is making me a better scientist
An essential round-up of science news, opinion and analysis, delivered to your inbox every weekday.
Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.
Nature (Nature) ISSN 1476-4687 (online) ISSN 0028-0836 (print)
© 2023 Springer Nature Limited


Leave a Comment